sides had the same data, but came to opposing conclusions.Neither side thought the other was doing “Real Linguistics.”
•“Oppenheimer and I often have the same facts
on a question and come to opposing decisions – he to one, I to another.Oppenheimer has high intelligence.He can’t be analyzing and interpreting the facts
wrong.I have high intelligence.I can’t be wrong.So with Oppenheimer it must be insincerity,
bad faith – perhaps treason” (Alvarez, p. 160).